Reviewing history and unveiling the truths of our origins

In seeking knowledge of our origins and purpose, we firstly have to admit, we don't know. There isn't anyone who knows our universal origins, where we reside in relation to the whole or any clear purpose or reason for being other than to be happy!

Many of us were taught to believe that civilisation is less than seven thousand years old and the fossil record a trick of the creator. This underlying thinking continues to colour our history, dressing facts as fictions and fictions as facts. Creationism still has its following however the evolutionists now dominate the opinion polls regarding our origins, but are they right?

Michael Cremo and the science of forbidden archaeology throws up some curly evidence in the form of tools and other signs indicating human presence on Earth many millions of years ago. Such notions are outside of main stream thinking as are extraterrestrial visitations. As such, these ideas don't fit any evolutionary or creationist theories yet they cannot be dismissed, they are possibilities which must remain open.

The broad consensus within the modern scientific community is that all modern humans are descended from an African population of Homo sapiens that migrated around the world but bred with local archaic populations as they did so. However it's likely travellers were in small groups and were absorbed into local populations.

So, let's have a look at mainstream thinking in that the modern human as we call ourselves today evolved from lesser species and that our basic form was developed around 200,000 years ago. We know that over this period we have slowly evolved to become the most dominant and technologically advanced species on the planet. There is ample evidence of simple tools, spears, arrows and Stone Age technology all over the planet to indicate that many of our ancestors were indeed hunter gatherers.

One point of conjecture is the evidence suggesting that before 10,000 BC, all humans were dark skinned, even those in Europe. The Neanderthal who are considered to be an evolutionary subspecies were dark skinned. They became extinct around 20,000 BC although the DNA evidence today suggests that they interbred with modern humans.

In many ways there seems to be little doubt that humanity to a certain degree evolved from the very first cooperative relationship between bacteria and mitochondria along with a degree of consciousness and desire to survive or be successful. All life from the very simplest organisms through every species has an intelligent drive to successfully exist and pass on its DNA and technology of survival.

In the archaeological trail left by many species we can see a degree of adaptation and divergences, especially within birds that are thought to have evolved from dinosaurs. They change their colour and size in order to better take advantage of a particular food source or environment to better ensure their survival. Now lets come back to the origins of the fair skinned human being.

We know that within dark skinned populations there is a degree of albinism and some theorists suggest that around 10,000 BC a genetic defect perhaps in association with albinism resulted in a completely new human subgroup with fair skin who spread across Europe. We know that historically (and in many places today) fair skin was seen as desirable that across the entire North Africa/Middle East and North Indian regions, the importation of fair skinned individuals evolved the current shades of brown.

The other intriguing theory other than a naturally occurring genetic twist to explain fair skin are the myths concerning the gods coming to earth and interbreeding with the human population. This is also perhaps why some theorists propose that modern fair skinned humans evolved in Eurasia and became the dominant group across Europe replacing Neanderthal man and other subspecies.

One must remember that if the gods came to earth, these would have been an extraterrestrial human species, visitors from outer space. There are some other intriguing points in the archaeological trail like the lion man statue dated to over 30,000 BC and discovered in Germany. But the style of this icon is definitely Hindu indicating technology and trade during this period where modern researchers tell us such things were not possible.

The most insidious miss-truth propagated by historians and history channel is
Referring to ancient cultural practices as beliefs and religions

"Ancient DNA studies are beginning to show some of the true complexity of human genetic history, including providing evidence for large-scale intercontinental movements in the last 30,000 years or so. The out-of-Africa model requires major intercontinental movements 40,000-60,000 years ago, as well as later expansion into the Americas. From these perspectives, it is perhaps more likely that large-scale movements have continued throughout human prehistory than not, and replacement from the east is thus an explanation to consider. Ultimately, the prehistory of this period must encompass fossil, archaeological and multiple forms of genetic data, and reconcile them into a coherent overall understanding. The unique genetic properties of the Y chromosome may offer insights into movement during an early period that is currently difficult to investigate in other ways and provide a glimpse of this prehistory." ~ Speinger